Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kiner v. City of Memphis Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv02805
Plaintiff:
Rev Gerald Kiner
Defendant:
City of Memphis Tennessee, Memphis Police Department, Officer L Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. The City of Memphis et al
as 2:2023cv02773
Plaintiff:
Ashley McKenzie Smith
Defendant:
The City of Memphis, Cerelyn Davis, Nahum Dorme and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Benford v. Knox County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Taj Verne Benford
Defendant:
Knox County Sheriff's Office, Tom Spangler, Bernie Lyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thurman v. Chariot et al (TV2)
as 2:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
James W Thurman
Defendant:
Bill Chariot, Mike Lay, Worm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
