Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv16286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
KAUL et al v. FEDERATION OF STATE MEDICAL BOARDS et al
as 2:2020cv18853
Plaintiff:
Richard Arjun Kaul and ARNOLD ERWIN FELDMAN
Defendant:
ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY, TD BANK N.A., ATLANTIC HEALTH SYSTEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KAUL et al v. FEDERATION OF STATE MEDICAL BOARDS et al
as 1:2020cv18853
Defendant:
ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY, TD BANK N.A., ATLANTIC HEALTH SYSTEM and others
Plaintiff:
M.D. Richard Arjun Kaul and ARNOLD ERWIN FELDMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA v. EVERETT
as 3:2019cv12541
Defendant:
DANIEL EVERETT
Plaintiff:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIAMS v. USA et al
as 2:2018cv14455
Defendant:
PRESIDENT OBAMA, NYPD, SENATOR CORY BOOKER and others
Plaintiff:
APRIL DENISE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS v. FBI NEWARK et al
as 2:2018cv14457
Defendant:
RAS BARAKA, CORY BOOKER, NYPD and others
Plaintiff:
APRIL DENISE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv14460
Defendant:
NYPD, SENATOR CORY BOOKER, GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY and others
Plaintiff:
APRIL DENISE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv14458
Defendant:
RAS BARAKA, NYPD, FBI NEWARK and others
Plaintiff:
APRIL DENISE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
