Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Holden Arboretum v. Geauga County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
Holden Arboretum
Defendant:
Geauga County Board of Commissioners, Geauga County, Eric J Cardinal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Las Cruces, New Mexico v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2021op45059
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Las Cruces, New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02283
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Pierce County, Georgia v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op46107
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Pierce County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bacon County, Georgia v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op46105
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Bacon County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
