Civil Rights Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
HOLLY v. PAULK
as 1:2024cv01512
Plaintiff: CECIL HOLLY
Defendant: RICHARD PAULK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
ARTIS v. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE REVIEW BOARD CASE NUMBER (1448584) 21-R-4078 et al
as 1:2021cv02432
Plaintiff: CECIL EUGENE ARTIS, JR.
Defendant: UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE REVIEW BOARD CASE NUMBER (1448584) 21-R-4078, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT and D 54 I RGIS INVENTORY SPECIOALISTS (D 45)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01051
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00569
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00052
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
FORREST v. BALLARD et al
as 4:2017cv00043
Defendant: PATRICIA BALLARD, PAULA CECIL and TEJUAN JOHNSON
Plaintiff: MARQUITA FORREST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00574
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BATES v. STATE OF INDIANA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00548
Plaintiff: CECIL A. BATES
Defendant: TIM BLACKWELL, CHIEF OF I.D.P., ANDREW FOGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00745
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00535
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?