Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Clayton v. Hogan et al
as 3:2022cv00936
Plaintiff:
Mark Clayton
Defendant:
Lauren Hogan, Glenn Funk, Amy Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01277
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Bordages v. United States Justice Dept. et al
as 2:2015cv02708
Plaintiff:
James Harry Hebert Bordages, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Justice Dept., United States Dept. of Homeland Security, United States Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sevier v. Rich et al
as 3:2013cv01098
Plaintiff:
Chris Sevier
Defendant:
John Rich, Bill O'Reilly, T.V. Guide Network and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ladd v. Bradley County Clerk's Office et al
as 1:2012cv00258
Plaintiff:
Avery J. Ladd, Jr.
Defendant:
Bradley County Clerk's Office, Gayla Miller and News Channel 9
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. U.S. Broadcasting & Advertising Law et al
as 2:2011cv02427
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
U.S. Broadcasting & Advertising Law, Fox 13 Channel 3 & 5 News Stations, Charles Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Maximus et al
as 3:2010cv00411
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Maximus, Unum, Hugh O. Maclellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Maximus et al
as 3:2010cv00412
Plaintiff:
(f/n/u) Doe
Defendant:
Maximus, Unum, Hugh O. Maclellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McBride v. Clear Channel
as 3:2009cv00742
Plaintiff:
Julius McBride
Defendant:
Clear Channel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayes et al v. U.S. Marshals et al
as 1:2009cv00047
Plaintiff:
Keith R. Mayes, Sr., Ruth V. Mayes and Gilda L. Mayes
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals, Maury County Sheriffs Department and News Channel 5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
