Civil Rights Cases filed in Arizona
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00381
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Marks v. Dixon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01804
Defendant: Amber Wood, Amber Nicole Dixon, Teresa Sanders and others
Plaintiff: Chester Lee Marks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marks v. McLerran et al
as 2:2019cv01640
Defendant: Peter Silverman, Jeffrey McLerran, Janet Johnson and others
Plaintiff: Chester Lee Marks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marks v. Garner
as 2:2017cv00528
Plaintiff: Chester Lee Marks
Defendant: Deborah L Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marks v. Runbeck
as 2:2017cv00086
Plaintiff: Chester Lee Marks
Defendant: Debra L Runbeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marks v. AARP Foundation Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv01329
Plaintiff: Chester Lee Marks
Defendant: AARP Foundation Incorporated, Paula Wright, Judy Montini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marks v. Cricket Communication Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00619
Plaintiff: Chester Lee Marks
Defendant: Cricket Communications Incorporated and Nick Vara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marks v. Arizona Department of Economic Security Unemployment Insurance Program et al
as 2:2010cv00576
Plaintiff: Chester Lee Marks
Defendant: Arizona Department of Economic Security Unemployment Insurance Program and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00520
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01591
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?