Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Greene v. Chicago Public School Burnham Elementary Administration Staff et al
as 1:2022cv02216
Plaintiff:
Zakkiyya A. Greene
Defendant:
Chicago Public School Burnham Elementary Administration Staff, Sheryl Freeman, Cassandra Lockridge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06558
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06381
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fonza v. Chicago Public Schools District #299 et al
as 1:2017cv03571
Plaintiff:
T.G.
Defendant:
Chicago Public Schools District #299 , KIPP Chicago Schools , Ellen Davis-Bhattacharyya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pope v. Board of Education for Chicago Public School District #299 et al
as 1:2011cv04524
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Pope
Defendant:
Board of Education of Chicago Public School District #299 and Cheryl Colston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
P. v. City of Chicago Public School District 299 et al
as 1:2010cv02604
Plaintiff:
T. P.
Defendant:
City of Chicago Public School District 299, Chicago Office of the Board of Education and Illinois State Board Of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
A.L, et al vs. Chicago Public School District #299
as 1:2010cv00494
Plaintiff:
A. L. and L. L.
Defendant:
Chicago Public School District #299 and Illinois State Board Of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
