Cases 1 - 10 of 224
Edward Ash v. City of Aurora, et al
as 24-2774
Defendant:
SAL CONTRERAS, Officer, JEFF SHERWOOD, Officer, JASON RUSSELL, Officer and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD L. ASH
Murphy v. City of Aurora et al
as 1:2024cv02726
Defendant:
Garrett Strode, Eric Dunston, City of Aurora Police Department, The and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chapman v. City of Aurora, et al
as 24-1375
Plaintiff:
JAMES CHAPMAN
Defendant:
TONY HANNAH, Officer, OFFICER PARTICIPANT DAVID GALLEGOS, OFFICER JAMES DECLAIRE and others
Antron Cannon v. Walker Filip, et al
as 24-2655
Defendant:
WALKER FILIP, P.O., #393, NATHALIA PINEDA, CITY OF AURORA, ILLINOIS and others
Plaintiff:
ANTRON CANNON
Packard, et al v. City and County of Denver, et al
as 24-1371
Defendant:
TIMOTHY DREITH, DAVID MCNAMEE, KEITH VALENTINE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ACKER, APRYL ALEXANDER, JOHNATHEN DURAN and others
Packard, et al v. City and County of Denver, et al
as 24-1367
Plaintiff:
AMANDA BLASINGAME, HOLLIS LYMAN, JACQUELYN PARKINS and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, KEITH VALENTINE, CORY BUDAJ and others
Torres-Encinas v. City of Aurora et al
as 1:2024cv02249
Plaintiff:
Alessandro Torres-Encinas
Defendant:
William Oxford, III and City of Aurora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bates (PS) et al v. City of Aurora, Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv02202
Defendant:
Aurora Police Department, Sperber, Green and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie A Bates and Melinda Dudley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Taylor v. Marchetti et al
as 1:2024cv05851
Plaintiff:
Johnny Taylor
Defendant:
Michael Morris, Connor Marchetti, Matthew Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ash v. City of Aurora et al
as 1:2024cv05398
Defendant:
Det Beiriger, Rachele Conant, Jamie Mosser and others
Plaintiff:
Edward L Ash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
