Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fantel, Jr. v. WARM Center et al
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
WARM Center and State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fantel, Jr. v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Fantel, Jr. v. FBI et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
FBI, Caitlin Isherwood and Mark Trovato
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fantel, Jr. v. Town of South Kingstown et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of South Kingstown, South Kingstown Police Department, Washington County Courthouse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fantel, Jr. v. Town of South Kingstown et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of South Kingstown, South Kingstown Police Department, United States Post Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Parker v. Hutnak, et al.
as 1:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
David Parker
Defendant:
Noelle Clapham, Kimberly Hutnak, Phyllis Hutnak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Efreom et al v. Raimondo et al
as 1:2020cv00122
Defendant:
Employees' Retirement System of Rhode Island, Gina Raimondo and Seth Magaziner
Plaintiff:
Brian Kennedy, Mary O'Connell McKenna, Sandra L. McCullough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. City of Providence et al
as 1:2016cv00105
Plaintiff:
Joshua Robinson
Defendant:
City of Providence, David D. Allen, Christopher Ziroli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendonca v. City of Providence et al
as 1:2012cv00850
Defendant:
City of Providence , Dean Esserman, Robert DeCarlo and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Mendonca
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
