Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jones v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Keisha Jones
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, Randell Jackson, Sheriff Tim Pounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Telfair County et al
as 3:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jonathan C. Davis
Defendant:
Telfair County, Edwin Neal, Annie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Clayton County Commissioners et al
as 1:2022cv04070
Plaintiff:
Haneif Emmanuel Brown
Defendant:
Clayton County Commissioners, Riverdale Police Department, Officer S Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COTTON v. BEN HILL COUNTY et al
as 1:2019cv00238
Defendant:
BEN HILL COUNTY, STEVE TAYLOR, SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE LEE COTTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00093
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gilbert et al v. City of Pine Lake, Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv00495
Plaintiff:
Elisha Gilbert, Jr.
Defendant:
R. Javoyne Hicks, Sarai Y'hudah-Green, Otanya Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swain v. Stewart et al
as 6:2019cv00003
Defendant:
Judge Jay Stewart, Sheriff Kyle Sapp, Harvey Weinstein and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Swain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Thurmond et al
as 1:2018cv00683
Plaintiff:
Elisha Gilbert, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael L. Thurmond, Burrell Ellis, Lee May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORGAN v. RACHALS et al
as 1:2016cv00022
Plaintiff:
APRIL PENHOLLOW MORGAN
Defendant:
REGGIE RACHALS, DENNIS PARKER, JEFFREY POTTER, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. HANCOCK et al
as 1:2015cv00109
Plaintiff:
NOEL LEE WILSON
Defendant:
H W BILLY HANCOCK, KARLA STOWE, MARK CASTEEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
