Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Reaves v. Criminal Division Customer Service Services Window
as 1:2012cv00384
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Reaves
Defendant:
Criminal Division Customer Service Services Window
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. DAV
as 1:2012cv00385
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Reaves
Defendant:
DAV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Criminal Division, Customer Service Services Window
as 1:2012cv00383
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Reaves
Defendant:
Criminal Division, Customer Service Services Window
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Criminal Division Customer Service Services Window
as 1:2012cv00382
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Reaves
Defendant:
Criminal Division Customer Service Services Window
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Criminal Division, Customer Service Services Window
as 1:2012cv00381
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Reaves
Defendant:
Criminal Division, Customer Service Services Window
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2012cv00108
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Reaves
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs and Thomas Russ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Department of Veterans Affairs, et al.
as 1:2012cv00107
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Reaves
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs and Thomas Russ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2012cv00109
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Reaves
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs and Thomas Russ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2011cv01395
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Reaves
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs and Jose Rivero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Claim Regional Office Fiduciary - D.C. Office et al
as 1:2011cv00620
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Reaves
Defendant:
Claim Regional Office Fiduciary - D.C. Office and Jose Riveo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
