Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Raj Jones v. Miami-Dade County, et al
as 24-11275
Plaintiff:
RAJ JONES
Defendant:
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, DANIEL JUNIOR, PABLO VALDES and others
Bernard Heriveaux v. Daniel Junior, et al
as 23-11284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BERNARD HERIVEAUX
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL JUNIOR, NAEEM PERVAIZ, ANGELA LAWRENCE, Chief, Individual Capacity and others
Hall v. Santiago et al
as 1:2022cv22105
Plaintiff:
Kristian J. Hall
Defendant:
Edward Santiago, Dana Robin Goldman, Daniel Junior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2022cv21990
Plaintiff:
Raj Jones
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County, Daniel Junior, Valdes Pablo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Heriveaux v. Junior et al
as 1:2022cv21591
Plaintiff:
BERNARD HERIVEAUX
Defendant:
Ex-Director Daniel Junior, Commander Naeem Pervaiz, Chief Angela Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00803
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, CARLOS GIMENEZ, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00686
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, CARLOS GIMENEZ, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Patterson v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2019cv22149
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County, Cecelia Altonaga, Rick Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Orange County Florida et al
as 1:2019cv21960
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County, Ashley Moody, Carlos Gimenez and others
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RG Options LLC v. Hubbard et al
as 1:2017cv02488
Plaintiff:
RG Options LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Junior Hubbard and Margaret Ann Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
