Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOODS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 3:2023cv24700
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WOODS
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, MAXIMUS MEDICARE PART C, CARE IMPROVEMENT PLUS SOUTH CENTRAL INSURANCE CO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Woods et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv05733
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ricardo Anguiano, Anthony Okon and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hockensmith v. Minor et al
as 1:2018cv00671
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey W. Hockensmith
Defendant:
John Minor, Erik J Bourgerie, Cheryl Giordano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colbert v. The City of Bowie et al
as 8:2016cv02811
Plaintiff:
Cameron Colbert
Defendant:
The City of Bowie and Daniel Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Stephens et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv05313
Defendant:
John Does 1-4, The City of New York and Daniel Woods
Plaintiff:
David Sealey and Gary Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Balkaran v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv01828
Plaintiff:
Murry Balkaran
Defendant:
Police Officer (s) John Doe 1-3 and The City of New York
Shield #26093)(Tax#939710:
Police Officer Daniel Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods et al v. Caridine, Star #13333 et al
as 1:2010cv07257
Plaintiff:
Daniel Woods and Robert Terrell
Defendant:
Chicago Police Offic Caridine, Star #13333, Chicago Police Offic Allen, Star #15090, Chicago Police Offic Ruhnke, Star #13698 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ochoa v. The City of Aurora et al
as 1:2007cv04421
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Ochoa
Defendant:
The City of Aurora, William Powell, Michael Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
