Cases 1 - 10 of 20
DOHERTY v. INDIANA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv01772
Plaintiff:
JEWEL LEE DOHERTY
Defendant:
INDIANA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, THE COMMUNITIES AT INDIAN HAVEN, INC. and AFFINITY HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Naslanic v. Golden et al
as 3:2015cv02208
Plaintiff:
Robert S Naslanic
Defendant:
William Golden, David Mitchell, Jason Gula and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Altwesh et al
as 1:2015cv02020
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Dixon
Defendant:
Michael Altwesh and Timothy Doherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fierman v. Doherty et al
as 1:2015cv01427
Plaintiff:
Jason Fierman
Defendant:
Timothy Doherty , Robert Speicher and Carol Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUGHEY v. DOHERTY
as 2:2014cv04356
Plaintiff:
LENA HUGHEY
Defendant:
RICHARD DOHERTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings-Fowler v. City of Scranton et al
as 3:2014cv00969
Plaintiff:
Patricia Jennings-Fowler
Defendant:
City of Scranton , Christopher Doherty and Unknown Additional Decision-Maker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ancherani v. City of Scranton et al
as 3:2013cv02595
Plaintiff:
Nelson Ancherani
Defendant:
City of Scranton, Christopher Doherty and Unknown Additional Decision-Maker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Albert et al v. City of Scranton et al
as 3:2012cv01333
Plaintiff:
Michael Albert , Peter Balchus , Jason Christiano and others
Defendant:
City of Scranton and Christopher A. Doherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUYANNES v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2011cv04478
Plaintiff:
DAVID J. NUYANNES
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, GERARD MCSHEA, JAMES P. BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
