Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Williams v. Sanders et al
as 3:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Damone Williams
Defendant:
Darryl Sanders and The City of Baton Rouge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson et al v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2021cv00141
Defendant:
Mark Ordoyne, Brandon Walker, Aaron Jaudon and others
Plaintiff:
Chico T Bell and Damon L Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carto v. Carmouche, et al
as 2:2018cv10335
Plaintiff:
Damone Carto and Demone Carto
Defendant:
Paul Carmouche, Jefferson Parish Sheriff, Charles Carollo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00624
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00760
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00575
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Gunning et al v. Parish of Franklin et al
as 3:2016cv01763
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Gunning and Stephen Gunning
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office Franklin Parish , Kevin Cobb , Damon Emfinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCool v. Amacker et al
as 2:2016cv14255
Plaintiff:
Nanine McCool
Defendant:
Dawn Amacker, Deborah Gambrell, Bennett J Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and A&M College et al
as 3:2016cv00379
Defendant:
F. King Alexander, Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and A&M College, A. G. Monaco and others
Plaintiff:
Roy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
