Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Montgomery et al v. Young et al
as 1:2023cv15677
Plaintiff:
Darius Montgomery and Lora Snapp
Defendant:
Timothy Young, Ryan Blaskey and City Of Aurora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowes-Northern v. Cook County Circuit Court et al
as 1:2021cv04675
Plaintiff:
Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Defendant:
Cook County Circuit Court, Cook County State Attorney Office, Markham Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woods et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv01671
Plaintiff:
Dazarine Woods and Melvin C Woods, Jr.
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Phyllis Gill , Darius West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bradford et al v. City of Chicago, a municipal corporation et al
as 1:2016cv01663
Plaintiff:
Linda Bradford
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Phyllis Gill , John Otto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Russell v. Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv05593
Plaintiff:
Darius Russell
Defendant:
City of Chicago, T. F. Frole and B. Manjarrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Jackson et al
as 1:2015cv04096
Plaintiff:
Darius Murphy
Defendant:
Kenneth Wayne Jackson, Deborah Mabery and The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Debra Jackson et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv03864
Plaintiff:
Debra Jackson , Darius Jackson , Ashley Jackson and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago and Unknown Number of Unnamed City of Chicago Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv08758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
