Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv03400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Brett v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv04535
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Jill Biden, Robert Rochinel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoover v. Poole et al
as 3:2023cv01340
Plaintiff:
Ryan Hoover
Defendant:
Debbie Poole and Lexington County School District 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beeson Development LLC et al v. Beeson et al
as 8:2018cv01318
Plaintiff:
Beeson Development LLC , J and E Holdings LLC and Joseph C Beeson
Defendant:
Anderson County, Ed Dutton, Lonnie Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elmore v. Elliott et al
as 4:2017cv02625
Plaintiff:
Kathy Price Elmore
Defendant:
Debbie Elliott, Pearlina Kennedy, Amanda Sample-Eugene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CFRE LLC et al v. Adkins et al
as 8:2014cv03825
Plaintiff:
CFRE LLC and Sherry T Ray
Defendant:
Debbie H Adkins , Real Property Services , Jill Kintigh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Columbia SC, City of et al
as 3:2013cv02715
Plaintiff:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas
Defendant:
Columbia SC, City of, The City's Police Department, Sara Heather Savitz Weiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv02805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
