Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Loney v. Dennis et al
as 3:2024cv02832
Plaintiff:
Carrie R. Loney
Defendant:
Anthony Dennis, Hampton Gardner, Medgar Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Milstead v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 2:2023cv01698
Plaintiff:
Julie Milstead
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services, Susan Alford, Michael Leach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moshoures v. North Myrtle Beach, City of et al
as 4:2022cv02123
Plaintiff:
Michael Moshoures
Defendant:
North Myrtle Beach, City of, Marilyn Hatley and Tommy Dennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banning et al v. County of Horry et al
as 4:2022cv00844
Plaintiff:
Wanda Banning, William D Gore, Margaret M Gore and others
Defendant:
County of Horry, Johnny Gardner, Harold Worley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hamilton v. Army Board of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00195
Plaintiff:
Jernice Hamilton and Garnaris Hamilton
Defendant:
Dennis William Dingle, Army Board of Corrections and Charles M Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
