Cases 1 - 10 of 10
KESSLER v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv00275
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS KESSLER
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS and MR. OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
DOUGLAS v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2015cv03137
Plaintiff:
MONTRELLE DOUGLAS
Defendant:
DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BENNETT v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv01025
Plaintiff:
CRAIG TROY BENNETT
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANNA v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY et al
as 2:2012cv01002
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD A. MANNA
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PAMELA P. COHEN (DEMBE), THE DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS OF PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HURT v. AMNESTY INTERNAITONAL, U.S.A. et al
as 2:2011cv06214
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL, U.S.A., INTERNATIONAL PEACE COURT, N.A.A.C.P., (1909) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2010cv03455
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MOORE
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, CITY MANAGER DIRECTOR PHILA., DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS PHILA. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Diaz et al
as 3:2009cv01848
Plaintiff:
Geremia Gill
Defendant:
Renato T. Diaz, Renato T. Diaz, PA Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
