Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Doe v. Eastern Michigan University Board of Regents et al
as 2:2021cv10649
Defendant:
Delta Tau Delta Theta XI Chapter, Eastern Michigan University Board of Regents, Alpha Sigma Phi Fraternity, INC and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 8 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Storms et al v. Oakland County Medical Control Authority et al
as 4:2020cv12457
Defendant:
Scott Minaudo, Doctor Doe 1, Sebrina Kerr and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Storms, Jake Kroll, Phillip Mulligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Kayla Renea Miller et al v. Stewart et al
as 2:2018cv12224
Plaintiff:
Estate of Kayla Renea Miller and Mary Sanders
Defendant:
Anthony Stewart, Pam Friess, Brittany Lorraine Shanks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Kayla Renea Miller et al v. Stewart et al
as 4:2018cv12224
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #1, John/Jane Doe #2, LPN Michelle Geymann and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Kayla Renea Miller and Mary Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. County of Macomb et al
as 2:2017cv11240
Plaintiff:
Dequan Jamail Flowers
Defendant:
County of Macomb , Macomb County Jail , Macomb County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe 1 et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv13765
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Rick Snyder, Daniel H. Heyns and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe 1 , John Doe 2 , John Doe 4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv12120
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
DOE 1 et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv14356
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE 1 , JOHN DOE 2 , JOHN DOE 3 and others
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Rick Snyder, Daniel H. Heyns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
