Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Brown v. Cincinnati Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00316
Defendant:
Elsa Esser, David Johnston, Cincinnati Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
DaQuan Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00065
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Wood v. Burchett
as 3:2022cv00011
Defendant:
Dustin White, Deborah Burchett, Dusty White and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00495
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Bingham v. State of Ohio et al
as 3:2020cv00449
Defendant:
Lima Police Department, Dustin Brotherwood, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Bingham Jr. and Leonard Bingham, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lohr et al v. Kiefer-Erb et al
as 2:2019cv03755
Defendant:
Sheriff Larry Mincks, Lt. Matthew R Martin, Officer Dustin Timberman and others
Plaintiff:
Derek J. Vanhorn, Robert Lohr and Robert L Lohr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Isham et al v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2019cv00577
Defendant:
Dustin Peet, City of Cincinnati, David Knox and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Isham and Anthony Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
