Civil Rights Cases filed in Pennsylvania
SMITH v. DAUPHIN COUNTY DOMESTICS
as 1:2021cv00236
Plaintiff: Charles E Smith
Defendant: Dauphin County Domestics
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Markle v. Hoffman et al
as 4:2018cv02037
Plaintiff: Joseph R. Markle
Defendant: Police Chief Reynolds, Harry E. Smith and Sgt. Bruce Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01241
Plaintiff: Charles E. Smith
Defendant: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Swatara Township Police Department and Dauphin County Booking Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00153
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Piecuch et al
as 4:2014cv01652
Plaintiff: Joseph E. Smith
Defendant: Michael Piecuch and Michael Hudock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Cserny et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02234
Plaintiff: Timothy E. Smith, Jr. and Tanya Smith
Defendant: Henry Cserny, Theodore Quaker and Loysville Youth Development Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv05784
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LABAR v. ALERCIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv04182
Plaintiff: DANIEL LABAR and DANIEL LABAR
Defendant: JAMES T. ALERCIA, KEITH BORDER, THOMAS VOGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00765
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?