Cases 1 - 10 of 161
O'Neal v. Kansas City Missouri Board of Police Commissioners et al
as 4:2024cv00535
Defendant:
Tom Whitaker, Quinton D Lucas, Kansas City Missouri Board of Police Commissioners and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth O'Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Humphrey v. Douglas Prosecuting Attorney
as 6:2024cv03179
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Humphrey
Defendant:
Douglas County Prosecuting Attorney
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
White v. State of Missouri et al
as 2:2024cv04104
Plaintiff:
Brandon White
Defendant:
Carol English, State of Missouri and Edward Guinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Humphrey v. Douglas Prosecuting Attorney
as 6:2024cv03135
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Humphrey
Defendant:
Douglas Prosecuting Attorney
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Humes v. T-Mobile Security John Doe
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Humes
Defendant:
T-Mobile Security John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Humes v. Kansas City, MO Police Department
as 4:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Humes
Defendant:
Kansas City, MO Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Edwards v. City of Ashland, Missouri
as 2:2023cv04217
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Edwards
Defendant:
City of Ashland, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
