Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Colter v. Mehki et al
as 3:2020cv02513
Defendant:
Chad Jones, K L Mehki, K. L. Mehki and others
Plaintiff:
Felicia R Colter and Felicia R. Colter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridgeway v. Culuma, et al.
as 1:2020cv00103
Plaintiff:
Felicia Ridgeway
Defendant:
Celina Culuma, UH Mentor Surgery Center and UH Bainbridge Health Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridgeway v. Rock, et al.
as 1:2019cv02920
Plaintiff:
Felicia Ridgeway
Defendant:
City Hall, Warrensville School District, Ms. Lensy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brock v. Hamilton County Sheriffs et al
as 1:2019cv00915
Plaintiff:
Felicia Brock
Defendant:
Hamilton County Clerk of Courts and Hamilton County Sheriffs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Ross v. Peregrine Health Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv01500
Defendant:
Nancy Murrey, Embassy Healthcare Grande Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation et. al, Cleveland Clinic et. al and others
Plaintiff:
Felicia L. Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kanu v. Siemens PLM Software et al
as 1:2018cv00038
Plaintiff:
Bryan Kanu
Defendant:
Felicia Boyd, Kettil Cedercreutz and Siemens PLM Software
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv02484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Time Warner Cable et al
as 1:2016cv00396
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lamont Barnes
Defendant:
Time Warner Cable, Time Warner Cable HR Dept., Kay Mushill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
