Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Elliott v. Tucker et al
as 4:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Jessica Elliott
Defendant:
Vincent Tucker, Felicia Sheeley, Carshunn Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vallo v. Pitre et al
as 3:2021cv01964
Plaintiff:
Melissa Vallo
Defendant:
Felicia Pitre, Latasha Levy, Toya Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hawthorne et al v. Dulweber et al
as 6:2020cv00478
Defendant:
Judge Alfonso Charles, Judge Scott Novy and Judge Vincent Dulweber
Plaintiff:
Felicia Pierce and Tonja Hawthorne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shields v. Unknown Party et al
as 3:2020cv00805
Respondent:
John Warren, Elsa C Denalde, Candice Beurden and others
Petitioner:
Jammie Jermaine Shields
Defendant:
Unknown Judge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shields v. Unknown Party et al
as 6:2020cv00115
Defendant:
Elsa C Denalde, Judge John Elder, John Warren and others
Plaintiff:
Jammie Jermaine Shields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Dallas County Health and Human Services
as 3:2020cv00325
Defendant:
Dallas County Health and Human Services
Plaintiff:
Felicia Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
