Cases 1 - 10 of 12
WOODALL v. MONROEVILLE POLICE et al
as 2:2023cv01370
Plaintiff:
JASON MICHAEL WOODALL
Defendant:
MONROEVILLE POLICE, SHEETZ CONVENIENCE STORE & GAS STATION, MAGISTRATE JEFFREY L. HERBST and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Moore v. Plachko et al
as 1:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Braxton J. Moore
Defendant:
David A. Plachko, Joseph C. Ferraro, Michael A. O'Pake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BARHAM v. DLG DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv01538
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BARHAM
Defendant:
DLG DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, DALE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. , JAY FERRARO and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0276
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Knick v. Scott Township et al
as 3:2014cv02223
Plaintiff:
Rose Mary Knick
Defendant:
Scott Township and Carl S. Ferraro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
L.P. GROUP 2, INC. v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv07484
Plaintiff:
L.P. GROUP 2, INC.
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , PERRITTI DIVIRGILIO , JAMES FERRARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEPRE v. LUKUS et al
as 3:2013cv00796
Plaintiff:
Gerald S. Lepre, Jr.
Defendant:
Paul S. Lukus , Christine Lukus, Forest City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
LEPRE v. LUKUS et al
as 2:2012cv00270
Plaintiff:
GERALD S. LEPRE, JR.
Defendant:
PAUL S. LUKUS, CHRISTINE LUKUS, FOREST CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
FERRARO et al v. BUSKIRK et al
as 5:2008cv05513
Plaintiff:
VINCENT FERRARO and ANTHONY TODORA
Defendant:
TODD BUSKIRK, CONNIE SUTTON-FALK, JOHN R. CONKLIN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
