Cases 1 - 10 of 16
JACKSON v. FLAHERTY et al
as 2:2023cv01166
Plaintiff:
LAMONT SAMUEL JACKSON and TEASHA YVONNE WRIGHT
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS E. FLAHERTY, MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS CAULFIELD, OFFICER LARRY HELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAGGITTI v. HON. BRET M. BINDER et al
as 2:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
HON. BRET M. BINDER, HON. ANTHONY T. VERWEY, HON. WILLIAM P. MAHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RICHARDSON v. OXLER
as 2:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
KAREN FLAHERTY OXLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
FLAHERTY v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY
as 2:2020cv01491
Plaintiff:
JULIE FLAHERTY and JULIANN FLAHERTY
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY as owner and operator of JOHN J. KANE REGIONAL CENTER-SC d/b/a KANE SCOTT CENTER, a skilled nursing facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01138
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
KENNEDY et al v. ARAMARK HOLDINGS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv02678
Plaintiff:
CHAL D. KENNEDY, SR.
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC , WALTER FLAHERTY , VERONICA LEMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARTER v. FLAHERTY
as 2:2012cv00946
Plaintiff:
JOHN HENRY CARTER
Defendant:
THOMAS FLAHERTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
