Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Nair et al v. Toth et al
as 2:2023cv00454
Defendant:
John Doe, Alex Toth, Paul Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Jayakumar Sundaran Nair, Rajakumari Susheelkumar, Jayakrishnan Krishnan Nair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Mickelson v. Dicks Sporting Goods Inc
as 2:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
Ian Mickelson
Defendant:
Dicks Sporting Goods Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Coleman-Taylor et al v. Multicare Health Systems
as 2:2021cv01414
Plaintiff:
Ms. Latoya Marie Coleman-Taylor, Mr Thomas Taylor, Latoya Marie Coleman-Taylor and others
Defendant:
MULTICARE HEALTH SYSTEMS and Multicare Health Systems doing business as Good Samaritan Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01729
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Seidenstricker et al v. City of SeaTac et al
as 2:2013cv01575
Petitioner:
Patricia Seidenstricker and Brian White
Respondent:
City of SeaTac , King County and SeaTac Committee for Good Jobs
Intervenor_defendant:
Alaska Airlines, Inc. and Washington Restaurant Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banta v. Good Samaritan Hospital
as 3:2012cv05079
Plaintiff:
Deborah J Banta
Defendant:
Good Samaritan Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Little v. Martin-Morris et al
as 2:2011cv00091
Plaintiff:
Brenda Joyce Little
Defendant:
Harium Martin-Morris , Kay Blume-Smith , Michael DeBell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
