Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Mishler et al v. Sassano
as 1:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Mishler and Gavin Mishler
Defendant:
Abby Sassano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gayle v. Benton Harbor Area Schools et al
as 1:2023cv01340
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Gayle
Defendant:
Benton Harbor Area Schools, Benton Harbor Area Schools Board of Education, Kelvin Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gavin v. Marsalese
as 2:2023cv10211
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Gavin
Defendant:
Bruce Alan Marsalese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv10919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv10925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hency et al v. St. Clair County et al
as 2:2017cv12040
Plaintiff:
Ginnifer Hency , Dean Hency , Stephanie Jones and others
Defendant:
St. Clair County , Melissa Keyes , St. Clair County Drug Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schlussel v. City of Dearborn Heights et al
as 2:2017cv11546
Plaintiff:
Deborah K Schlussel
Defendant:
City of Dearborn Heights , City of Dearborn Heights Police Dept. , Daniel Paletko and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1340
Hency et al v. Keyes et al
as 2:2016cv14110
Defendant:
Melissa Keyes, St. Clair County Drug Task Force, St Clair, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Ginnifer Hency , Dean Hency , Stephanie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gavin v. Hibbs
as 2:2016cv11318
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Gavin
Defendant:
Roy L. Hibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
