Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Richman v. Bush et al
as 2:2016cv02401
Plaintiff:
Elroy Ladell Richman
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Barack H. Obama and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richman v. Bush et al
as 2:2016cv02089
Plaintiff:
Elroy Ladell Richman
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Barack Obama and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Simmons et al
as 1:2012cv00216
Plaintiff:
Antoine Marquis Ray
Defendant:
Ron Joseph Simmons, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Bragg
as 1:2012cv00217
Plaintiff:
Antoine Marquis Ray
Defendant:
Terrance Bragg, Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Communications Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wright v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv02065
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack Obama, George W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gant v. Rice et al
as 3:2011cv00072
Plaintiff:
Johnny Gant
Defendant:
Condoleezza Rice and George W. Bush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ervin v. Bush et al
as 3:2008cv00146
Plaintiff:
Dwight Ervin
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weidrick v. Bush et al
as 3:2007cv00687
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo Weidrick
Defendant:
George W. Bush, National Security Agency, CIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. Roane County, TN et al
as 3:2007cv00187
Plaintiff:
Rocky Joe Houston
Defendant:
Roane County, TN, David Beams, City of Oak Ridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. Bush et al
as 3:2007cv00008
Plaintiff:
Rocky Joe Houston
Defendant:
George W Bush, Thomas W Phillips, Leonard Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
