Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Hill v. Beard et al
as 3:2023cv01346
Plaintiff:
Ricky Hill
Defendant:
Jason Beard, Eric Murphy and Gonzales Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Southern Towing & Transport, LLC et al v. City of Gonzales
as 3:2023cv00473
Plaintiff:
Southern Towing & Transport, LLC and Gonzales Towing and Repair, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donaldsonville Glass and Body Works, Inc. v. Gonzales Municipal Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00817
Plaintiff:
Donaldsonville Glass and Body Works, Inc.
Defendant:
Gonzales Municipal Police Department and Sherman D Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Terrell v. Town of Woodworth et al
as 1:2021cv04224
Plaintiff:
Quentin Terrell
Defendant:
Town of Woodworth, Berkshire Hathaway Guard Insurance Companies, David Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of Gonzales
as 3:2021cv00031
Defendant:
City of Gonzales
Plaintiff:
Spenser G. Smith and Spenser Glenn Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Banks et al v. City of Gonzales et al
as 3:2018cv00634
Plaintiff:
Dorestine Banks, Fredrick Banks, Robert Banks, Jr and others
Defendant:
City of Gonzales, Gary Ferrari, Gonzales Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Stewart et al
as 2:2017cv16868
Defendant:
James Stewart, Thomas Mushinsky, Devin Milazzo and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00435
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
