Cases 1 - 10 of 11
EISENKERCH v. TECHDASH COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
as 3:2022cv07294
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA EISENKERCH
Defendant:
GOODMAN COMMUNICATION SERVICES, LLC and TECHDASH COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
KAETZ v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv01003
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv16908
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv06943
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
EL BEY v. SHERIDAN et al
as 1:2018cv14976
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD JEFFERSON EL BEY
Defendant:
KEVIN P. MCGOVERN, JUDGE LOIS H. GOODMAN, JUDGE PETER G. SHERIDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GOODMAN v. BARNABAS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH/MMCS
as 3:2016cv09442
Plaintiff:
LENNETTE GOODMAN
Defendant:
BARNABAS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH/MMCS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RADIATION DATA, INC. v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al
as 3:2016cv06297
Plaintiff:
RADIATION DATA, INC.
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION , BOB MARTIN , PAUL BALDAUF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MA'AT: EL-BEY v. JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2012cv04483
Plaintiff:
CHESTER-RAY: MA'AT: EL-BEY
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, SCANLON, BURGESS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
