Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv03370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Employment Discrimination (Sex)
Antietam Battlefield et al v. Hogan et al
as 1:2020cv01130
Plaintiff:
Rev. James Wickham, Delegate Warren Miller, David Serenda and others
Defendant:
Woodrow W. Jones, III, Frances B. Phillips, Robert J. Neall and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cutler
Amicus Curiae:
Americans United for Separation of Church and State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Loh et al
as 8:2016cv03314
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Wallace Loh, Linda Clement, Catherine A. Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. University of Maryland - College Park et al
as 8:2012cv03217
Plaintiff:
Abraham M. Goodwin
Defendant:
University of Maryland - College Park, Wallace D. Loh, Robert M. Specter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
N.T.,et al v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners et al
as 1:2011cv00356
Defendant:
Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners , Andres A. Alonso , Dale J. Halterman and others
Plaintiff:
N.T. and Rachael Mooring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Vaeth v. Board of Trustees, Fire & Police Employees Retirement Systems of Baltimore City et al
as 1:2008cv00708
Plaintiff:
Brian Charles Vaeth
Defendant:
Board of Trustees, Fire & Police Employees Retirement Systems of Baltimore City, William J. Goodwin, Mayor & City Council of Baltimore City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
