Cases 1 - 10 of 164
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
OIC Dreams Greene County IV Inc v. Benison
as 7:2023cv01297
Plaintiff:
OIC Dreams Greene County IV Inc
Defendant:
Sheriff Jonathan Benison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Attia v. Cannon Ford et al
as 1:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
Joel B. Attia
Defendant:
Cannon Ford, Randy Niel, David Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Attia v. Cannon Ford et al
as 1:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Joel B. Attia
Defendant:
Cannon Ford, David Jackson, Chad Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Gaddis v. Spencer et al
as 2:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddis
Defendant:
Kenneth Spencer, Darryl Green and David Randall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matlock v. Puryear et al
as 5:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
Gary Matlock
Defendant:
Eric Puryear, Ryan Green, James Berryman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCall v. New Life Interfaith Ministries Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Kenyon J McCall
Defendant:
New Life Interfaith Ministries Inc, George Matthews, II, Michael B. Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
