Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Lee et al v. City of Austin et al
as 1:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Flynn Lee, Rochion Gregg and Andrea Jordan
Defendant:
City of Austin and Carol Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hill v. Garcia et al
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Gregg Hill
Defendant:
Edgardo Garcia, Jose Hernandez, James Kepaeltas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Employment Discrimination under A.D.A.
Ratcliff v. Hubbard et al
as 4:2023cv02829
Plaintiff:
Elijah W Ratcliff
Defendant:
Stephen J Hubbard, Jenkins & Young, P.C., Hull Associates PC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Budreau v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Budreau
Defendant:
The State Of Texas, Ken Paxton, Elizabeth Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Budreau v. The State of Texas et al
as 3:2023cv00711
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Budreau
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Ken Paxton, Elizabeth Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Houston Land and Cattle Company, LC v. Bisso et al
as 3:2021cv00247
Plaintiff:
Houston Land and Cattle Company, LC
Defendant:
Gregg Bisso and Village of Surfside Beach, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dahl v. Bisso et al
as 3:2021cv00248
Plaintiff:
Ted Dahl
Defendant:
Gregg Bisso and Village of Surfside Beach, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Hicks et al
as 4:2021cv00960
Plaintiff:
NaKisha Jackson
Defendant:
S. Maurice Hicks, Jr., Mark L. Hornsby, Edith H. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey et al v. Abbott et al
as 3:2021cv00201
Defendant:
Frank D Osborne, Steven Elliot Reis, Gregg Abbott and others
Plaintiff:
Kamal Bey and Takijah Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
