Cases 1 - 10 of 10
GRIMES v. GS1
as 3:2022cv04247
Plaintiff:
JEROME L. GRIMES
Defendant:
GS1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv12207
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BEY v. MILLER et al
as 1:2018cv11934
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #861, JUDGE WILLIAM TODD MILLER, TINA MONTELLA and others
Plaintiff:
TYHESHA BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. MS. DYKES et al
as 1:2018cv09516
Plaintiff:
VINCENT LOPEZ
Defendant:
MS. DYKES, MORGAGE ACCOUNT SEALED BY PRIVATE ENCRYPTION CODE: "#-053 and MR. GRIMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIMES v. AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.
as 2:2018cv01936
Plaintiff:
JEROME L GRIMES
Defendant:
AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESTATE OF LYDIA JOY PERRY et al v. SLOAN et al
as 3:2010cv04646
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF LYDIA JOY PERRY , VIVIAN KALE and JANET FANDEL
Defendant:
DEBRA SLOAN, STATE OF NEW JERSEY; DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES-DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, BRIDGET GRIMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. CITY OF CAMDEN THROUGH ITS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2010cv00133
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN THROUGH ITS POLICE DEPARTMENT, SERGEANT ALVIE GRIMES, INVESTIGATOR BRIAN RICE and others
Plaintiff:
ROMAN THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
TOODLE et al v. TURNER et al
as 3:2007cv05179
Plaintiff:
SANDRA B. TOODLE, LINDA POWELL, LUGENE POWELL and others
Defendant:
GERALDINE TURNER, THEODORE R. TOODLE, GEORGE BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
