Cases 1 - 10 of 10
GRUBB v. MEADE et al
as 3:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
DONALD RAY GRUBB
Defendant:
JEFREY MEADE, TANNER HURLEY and ISP TROOPER 9448
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MILLER v. WALMART STORES, INC. et al
as 4:2019cv00001
Defendant:
CITY OF SEYMOUR, TROY VANOVER, SETH SAGE and others
Plaintiff:
JESSICA MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01086
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
ELIQUITECH, INC. v. COOK et al
as 1:2016cv03361
Defendant:
DAVID COLEMAN, DAVID COOK, DALE GRUBB and others
Plaintiff:
ELIQUITECH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
GOODCAT, LLC v. COOK et al
as 1:2016cv01514
Intervenor:
CLOUDTOWN, LLC, DNM VENTURES, LLC, LICENSED E-LIQUID MANUFACTURING LLC and others
Defendant:
DAVID COLEMAN, DAVID COOK, DALE GRUBB and others
Movant:
DB VAPES, LLC
Plaintiff:
GOODCAT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
LEGATO VAPORS LLC et al, v. COOK, et al.
as 1:2015cv00761
Defendant:
DAVID COLEMAN, DAVID COOK, DALE GRUBB and others
Plaintiff:
DERB E CIGS INDIANA LLC, JET SETTER JUICE LLC, LEGATO VAPORS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00635
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
MARSH v. CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 4:2008cv00014
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN P. MARSH
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA, DANIEL RODDEN, CHALICE BAIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
