Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
GRUBBS v. MILLER et al
as 2:2017cv00555
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA GRUBBS
Defendant:
RUSSELL P. MILLER, JR. , ALLEN CLARKE and SOUTH CONNELLSVILLE BOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLUNK v. NOONE et al
as 1:2016cv01147
Plaintiff:
Richard P. Glunk
Defendant:
Joyce McKeever , Ollice Bates, Jr. , Kerry Maloney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLUNK v. NOONE et al
as 2:2015cv05565
Plaintiff:
RICHARD P. GLUNK
Defendant:
R. BARRETT NOONE, SCOTT M. GOLDMAN, MARIE VANBUSKIRK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glunk v. Pennsylvania State Board of Medicine et al
as 1:2014cv00659
Plaintiff:
Richard P. Glunk
Defendant:
Pennsylvania State Board of Medicine , Pennsylvania Department of State , Joyce McKeever and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HART v. OPPMAN et al
as 2:2014cv01367
Plaintiff:
JOHN HART
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER OPPMAN, GILMORE, C. J. MCKEOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
DONOHUE et al v. HANOVER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2010cv00250
Plaintiff:
JAMES DONOHUE, III, JAMES DONOHUE, II and JASON KRIVAK
Defendant:
HANOVER TOWNSHIP, DAVE DUERR, NANCY VOELKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANSELL v. ROSS TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2009cv01398
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ANSELL
Defendant:
ROSS TOWNSHIP, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, MATTHEW E. GRUBB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FIELDS et al v. PRO-GUARD SECURITY, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv03387
Plaintiff:
KOLBEA FIELDS and TINA FIELDS
Defendant:
PRO-GUARD SECURITY, INC., BRYAN E. MCGRAY, MICHAEL KENNEDY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
