Civil Rights Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00071
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00284
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Hawkins et al v. Fagan
as 2:2023cv00010
Plaintiff: Nancy Hawkins and Anthony McClintock
Defendant: Sean Fagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COOMER ET AL V. NOEL ET AL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00079
Plaintiff: Beatrice Coomer, tarin Cox, Lindsey Culver and others
Defendant: Jamie Noel, CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, David J Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00341
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
EDGE v. HAWKINS et al
as 1:2020cv02668
Defendant: JAMES BELL, MIKE HART, RYAN MEARS and others
Plaintiff: VINSON L. EDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00252
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00182
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00316
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv04618
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?