Cases 1 - 10 of 229
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Reaves et al v. Kyler et al
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves, Tiesha Danielle Evans and Dmitri A. Reaves
Defendant:
David Levert Kyler, Officer Sutton, County of Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Lee v. Henry County et al
as 1:2024cv00640
Plaintiff:
Phillip Avery Lee
Defendant:
Henry County, Reginald Scrandrett and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henry et al v. Neal et al
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Aja N. Henry and James A. Henry
Defendant:
Joyce Neal, DeKalb County Corp., Marshal Sgt. L. Huang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Robert Emmanuel Richardson
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Henry County Superior Court, Pandora Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
