Civil Rights Cases filed in Michigan
Cases 1 - 10 of 172
Procter v. Farmington Hills Police Department
as 2:2024cv11520
Plaintiff: Clark Procter
Defendant: Farmington Hills Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hurst v. Auburn Hills Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv11522
Plaintiff: Arnold Hurst
Defendant: Auburn Hills Police Department, Moore and Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Provident Asset Management LLC
as 5:2024cv11500
Plaintiff: Spring Hill
Defendant: Provident Asset Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv10821
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
SJ, et al v. Pontiac, City of et al
as 2:2024cv10111
Plaintiff: SJ and SE, Lawrence F Jasper, II, Rosalia O Jasper and others
Defendant: Pontiac, City of, Pontiac Housing Commission, Mungo & Mungo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12764
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01075
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01065
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 American With Disabilities Act- Discrimination
Jackson v. Ciesielski et al
as 2:2023cv12491
Plaintiff: Phillip Jackson
Defendant: Paxtyn Ciesielski, Jason Hammond, City of Farmington Hills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv12302
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?