Cases 1 - 10 of 10
McKenna v. HP Incorporated et al
as 3:2022cv08016
Plaintiff:
Annette-Lynn McKenna
Defendant:
HP Incorporated, Enquire Lores, Christoph Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McKenna v. HP Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv08271
Plaintiff:
Annette-Lynn McKenna
Defendant:
HP Incorporated, Enquire Lores, Christoph Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bollfrass et al v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2019cv04014
Defendant:
Julie Bosshart, Donna Magaard, Dina Fernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Bollfrass and Frank Czyzewski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pleaugh v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2019cv01746
Defendant:
City of Phoenix Housing Department, Dina Fernandez, James Navarrette and others
Plaintiff:
Clyver Pleaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Coven v. Romero et al
as 2:2013cv01267
Plaintiff:
Daniel Saul Coven
Defendant:
Regina Romero, Robert Peck, Jeffrey Dunst and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Toy et al v. Norheim et al
as 3:2013cv08063
Plaintiff:
Doris Cecelia Toy and Joseph T Toy
Defendant:
Jon Norheim, John T Jenzen, Clark County District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coven v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2012cv01418
Plaintiff:
Daniel Saul Coven
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Regina Romero, Robert Peck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007at10284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
