Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Clark et al v. George Junior Republic et al
as 2:2023cv00922
Plaintiff:
QUINTIS CLARK, CHARLES SLADE, III, ALEXANDER GRANGER and others
Defendant:
GEORGE JUNIOR REPUBLIC, GEORGE JUNIOR REPUBLIC REALTY, GEORGE JUNIOR REPUBLIC IN PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00928
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kabler v. United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 1776 Keystone State et al
as 1:2019cv00395
Defendant:
Michael Newsome, Peg Rhodes, Wendell W. Young, IV and others
Plaintiff:
John R. Kabler, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04770
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
HOLDEN v. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2016cv01354
Plaintiff:
BRYAN HOLDEN
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bensinger v. Township of Hegins et al
as 3:2015cv01450
Plaintiff:
Jack L. Bensinger, Jr.
Defendant:
Township of Hegins , Mike Begis , Leroy Shuey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TERRY v. YEADON BOROUGH et al
as 2:2012cv06205
Plaintiff:
EVERETT K. TERRY
Defendant:
YEADON BOROUGH, BOROUGH COUNCIL YEADON BOROUGH, DOLORES JONES-BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fitzhugh v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00591
Plaintiff:
Susan Fitzhugh
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Jeffery A. Beard, Ph.D., John Kerestes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SURYA v. HOLDEN
as 2:2011cv03646
Plaintiff:
VENU SURYA
Defendant:
JEFFREY HOLDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
