Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doe DH v. Scottsdale Inns LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00759
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe (D.H.) and Jane Doe DH
Defendant:
Scottsdale Inns LLC doing business as Howard Johnson, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Incorporated, Scottsdale Inn LLC doing business as Howard Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Domas v. Towers et al
as 3:2022cv08197
Plaintiff:
Harry P Domas
Defendant:
Tim Towers, Bonnie Towers, William Wilder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Haaland et al
as 2:2022cv01515
Defendant:
Merrick Brian Garland, Andrew Marshall Saul, Donna Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Dejon Lamar Christopher Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Parker v. Blinken et al
as 2:2022cv01394
Plaintiff:
Jamal Darius Parker and Jamal El Trust
Defendant:
Anthony Blinken, Debra Anne Haaland, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Howard v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2022cv01148
Plaintiff:
John Howard
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Jeremiah Fiola, Rayonte Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
