Cases 1 - 10 of 153
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv10176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Howard v. Macomb, County of
as 1:2023cv12595
Plaintiff:
Faytima Howard and Faytima Leak
Defendant:
Macomb County and Macomb, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Howard v. J. et al
as 4:2023cv12549
Plaintiff:
Gary M. Howard
Defendant:
Seifert J., Jason Singleton, Canton Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Doe et al v. Nessel et al
as 1:2023cv11655
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Tim Brown
Defendant:
Dana Nessel, Anica Letica, One Court of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Auk et al v. Detroit, City of et al
as 4:2023cv10897
Plaintiff:
Bryan Auk and Anthony Auk
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Alonzo Jones, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Kalamazoo, City of et al
as 1:2022cv01132
Plaintiff:
Douglas Howard
Defendant:
City of Kalamazoo, Justin Aaron Wolbrink, Caleb Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
