Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Hughes Faulk v. US District Court
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Michelle L. Hughes Faulk
Defendant:
US District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hughes Faulk v. Washington County Circuit Court et al
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Michelle L. Hughes Faulk
Defendant:
Washington County Circuit Court and State of Oregon Judicial Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schoene v. Oregon Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Schoene
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Human Services, Linda Lawing, Robi Tobar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00991
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Ramirez v. Kornegay et al
as 3:2020cv00152
Plaintiff:
Maricela Ramirez
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Joshua Kornegay, Addrienne Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallender et al v. Harney County et al
as 2:2019cv00004
Defendant:
Lucas McLain, david ward, Harney County and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wallender and lori wallender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Singh et al v. Trump et al
as 3:2018cv01912
Defendant:
Field Office Dir. Richard L Miller, Richard Ives, Ronald D Vitiello and others
Plaintiff:
Gurpreet Singh and Pachattar Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb
Mitchell v. Clackamas River Water et al
as 3:2016cv00537
Defendant:
Michael Cardwell, Clackamas River Water, Kenneth Humberston and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
