Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Price v. Broken Arrow, City of et al
as 6:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Harold Price
Defendant:
Broken Arrow, City of, Michael Spurgeon, Kenneth Schwab and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price et al v. LaFaver Fiberglass Corporation et al
as 6:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Harold Price and Patricia A. Price
Defendant:
LaFaver Fiberglass Corporation and Bobby Joe LaFaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Garrett v. Anderson et al
as 6:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Marvin Garrett
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Anderson, Errol R. Arthur, Julie Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price et al v. LaFaver Fiberglass Corporation et al
as 6:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Harold Price and Patricia A. Price
Defendant:
LaFaver Fiberglass Corporation and Bobby Joe LaFaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00326
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Brown v. The Town of Valley Brook et al
as 5:2019cv00169
Plaintiff:
Harold W Brown
Defendant:
John Doe, Michael Stamp and The Town of Valley Brook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
