Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Mitchell v. Barnard et al
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Randall Mitchell
Defendant:
Terry Barnard and David Herring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
PEREZ v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Delfidio Perez
Defendant:
Freddie L Bryant, III, Tony B Herring, Jr., Kenneth L Weston, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Golden Eagle AG Labor Consulting, LLC et al v. Butler et al
as 1:2022cv02851
Plaintiff:
Golden Eagle AG Labor Consulting, LLC, Jesus Alberto Gonzales and Herring Farms, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark Butler, Christina Smith and Martin J. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EL v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 5:2020cv00231
Plaintiff:
TEZ BEN EL
Defendant:
ROBYN CRITTENDEN, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and ROBYN CRITTENDEN In her private Capacity doing business as COMMISSIONER OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Smith et al
as 1:2020cv00518
Defendant:
Instagram, Kyle ? (App Official From Ohio), App and others
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Prayton Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HERRING v. CITY OF THOMASVILLE et al
as 7:2019cv00101
Defendant:
CITY OF THOMASVILLE, TODD MOBLEY, CHERYL PRESHA and others
Plaintiff:
INDANEKWA HERRING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
