Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Soil Friends LLC et al v. Comstock, Charter Township of et al
as 1:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
Soil Friends LLC, Mr. Benjamin Martin, Mrs. Sarah Martin and others
Defendant:
Comstock Charter Township, Kalamazoo Area Building Authority, Ms. Jodi Stefforia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jackson v. Canady et al
as 1:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Adrian M. Jackson
Defendant:
Clinton Canady, III, Edward Hess and Joe Finnerty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv10255
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jones v. Hess et al
as 1:2021cv00051
Defendant:
Unknown Party #2, Benjamin Hess, Ron Slagel and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Darnell Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01133
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv12631
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brown v. Portage, City of et al
as 1:2013cv01258
Plaintiff:
Steven Brown
Defendant:
Portage, City of, Jeffrey Lehmann and Dereck Hess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sousley et al v. Michigan, State of, et al
as 2:2013cv13950
Defendant:
Michigan, State of , Amber Williams , Mary E. Hess and others
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Sousley , Scott Sousley and Innovative Medicine, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sousley et al v. Michigan et al
as 2:2013cv13664
Plaintiff:
Scott Sousley, Rhonda Sousley and Innovative Medicine. P.C.
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, Amber Williams and others
Wright et al v. Harshberger et al
as 2:2012cv15379
Plaintiff:
Arsemus Wright and Marquette Wright
Defendant:
Sgt. Harshberger, Officer Weise, Officer Kollman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
