Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Frei v. Town of Holland et al
as 3:2018cv30187
Defendant:
Christian Petersen, Town of Holland, James Wettlaufer and others
Plaintiff:
Peter K. Frei
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Frei v. Town of Holland et al
as 3:2013cv30076
Plaintiff:
Peter Frei
Defendant:
Town of Holland , Planning Board of Holland , Jack Keogh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv10476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Mellen v. President Chain Store Corp et al
as 1:2011cv10216
Plaintiff:
Jay Patrick Mellen
Defendant:
President Chain Store Corp, 7 Eleven Inc., 7 Eleven Manager Lowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howe v. North Andover, The Town of et al
as 1:2010cv10116
Plaintiff:
Margaret Howe, Margaret Howe, A.H. and others
Defendant:
North Andover, The Town of, North Andover, The Town of, Mark F. Delaney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Lamountain v. McCollum et al
as 4:2009cv40210
Plaintiff:
James P Lamountain
Defendant:
Robert McCollum, Timothy McKenna, James Wettlaufer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LaMountain v. McCollum et al
as 3:2009cv40210
Plaintiff:
James P. LaMountain
Defendant:
Robert McCollum, Robert McCollum, Timothy McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cruz v. Campbell et al
as 1:2007cv12112
Plaintiff:
Carlos A. Cruz
Defendant:
Gilbert G. Campbell, Gilbert G. Campbell, BJ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
